<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OC Fundraiser for Huckabee a Huge Success</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogforbooks.com/archives/2008/02/01/oc-fundraiser-for-huckabee-a-huge-success/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogforbooks.com/archives/2008/02/01/oc-fundraiser-for-huckabee-a-huge-success/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:42:58 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ChrisCaesar</title>
		<link>http://blogforbooks.com/archives/2008/02/01/oc-fundraiser-for-huckabee-a-huge-success/comment-page-1/#comment-23659</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisCaesar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogforbooks.com/archives/2008/02/01/oc-fundraiser-for-huckabee-a-huge-success/#comment-23659</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey. I appreciate that too. Nice talking/blogging.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Chris&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey. I appreciate that too. Nice talking/blogging.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy L. Harp</title>
		<link>http://blogforbooks.com/archives/2008/02/01/oc-fundraiser-for-huckabee-a-huge-success/comment-page-1/#comment-23658</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy L. Harp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogforbooks.com/archives/2008/02/01/oc-fundraiser-for-huckabee-a-huge-success/#comment-23658</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Chris,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your clarifications.  Let me just say this though, I don&#039;t think what you wrote was a verbal bomb, I just used that term to describe how it felt to me when I read the article and based on previous media coverage on Huck.  And like I said, considering how liberal you are, you did a pretty good job being objective.  I appreciate that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Stacy&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>Thank you for your clarifications.  Let me just say this though, I don&#8217;t think what you wrote was a verbal bomb, I just used that term to describe how it felt to me when I read the article and based on previous media coverage on Huck.  And like I said, considering how liberal you are, you did a pretty good job being objective.  I appreciate that.</p>
<p>Stacy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisCaesar</title>
		<link>http://blogforbooks.com/archives/2008/02/01/oc-fundraiser-for-huckabee-a-huge-success/comment-page-1/#comment-23657</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisCaesar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogforbooks.com/archives/2008/02/01/oc-fundraiser-for-huckabee-a-huge-success/#comment-23657</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Stacy,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Glad you liked the article. Just to respond to some of your points:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;--According to my notes, you said &quot;if there was one thing I could change about this campaign, it would be that [the country music].&quot; I agree it was jocularly put, but the point was made earnestly. It&#039;s true you didn&#039;t, verbatim, refer to them as &quot;themes&quot;, though I didn&#039;t put that in quotations. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;--I don&#039;t write the headlines, but I do know that our editor (who does write the headlines) was not intending to suggest that only Huckabee visits Newport Beach for fund-raisers -- that would be kind of ridiculous, I agree. He meant it was an &quot;ATM&quot; for all candidates; it&#039;s a joke he&#039;s made in other headlines as well. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;--I don&#039;t think that &quot;criticism&quot; necessarily denotes vitriolic denunciations. I would say your post above is critical of what I wrote in the Pilot, though hardly a verbal bomb. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/criticize&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the nod, however. Nice meeting you at the event. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Chris&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stacy,</p>
<p>Glad you liked the article. Just to respond to some of your points:</p>
<p>&#8211;According to my notes, you said &#8220;if there was one thing I could change about this campaign, it would be that [the country music].&#8221; I agree it was jocularly put, but the point was made earnestly. It&#8217;s true you didn&#8217;t, verbatim, refer to them as &#8220;themes&#8221;, though I didn&#8217;t put that in quotations. </p>
<p>&#8211;I don&#8217;t write the headlines, but I do know that our editor (who does write the headlines) was not intending to suggest that only Huckabee visits Newport Beach for fund-raisers &#8212; that would be kind of ridiculous, I agree. He meant it was an &#8220;ATM&#8221; for all candidates; it&#8217;s a joke he&#8217;s made in other headlines as well. </p>
<p>&#8211;I don&#8217;t think that &#8220;criticism&#8221; necessarily denotes vitriolic denunciations. I would say your post above is critical of what I wrote in the Pilot, though hardly a verbal bomb. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/criticize" rel="nofollow">http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/criticize</a></p>
<p>Thanks for the nod, however. Nice meeting you at the event. </p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisCaesar</title>
		<link>http://blogforbooks.com/archives/2008/02/01/oc-fundraiser-for-huckabee-a-huge-success/comment-page-1/#comment-23656</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisCaesar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogforbooks.com/archives/2008/02/01/oc-fundraiser-for-huckabee-a-huge-success/#comment-23656</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Stacy,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Glad you liked the article. Just to respond to some of your points:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;--According to my notes, you said &quot;if there was one thing I could change about this campaign, it would be that [the country music].&quot; I agree it was jocularly put, but the point was made earnestly. It&#039;s true you didn&#039;t, verbatim, refer to them as &quot;themes&quot;, though I didn&#039;t put that in quotations. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;--I don&#039;t write the headlines, but I do know that our editor (who does write the headlines) was not intending to suggest that only Huckabee visits Newport Beach for fund-raisers -- that would be kind of ridiculous, I agree. He meant it was an &quot;ATM&quot; for all candidates; it&#039;s a joke he&#039;s made in other headlines as well. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;--I don&#039;t think that &quot;criticism&quot; necessarily denotes vitriolic denunciations. I would say your post above is critical of what I wrote in the Pilot, though hardly a verbal bomb. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Criticize:
 2  : to find fault with : point out the faults of  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the nod, however. Nice meeting you at the event. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Chris&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stacy,</p>
<p>Glad you liked the article. Just to respond to some of your points:</p>
<p>&#8211;According to my notes, you said &#8220;if there was one thing I could change about this campaign, it would be that [the country music].&#8221; I agree it was jocularly put, but the point was made earnestly. It&#8217;s true you didn&#8217;t, verbatim, refer to them as &#8220;themes&#8221;, though I didn&#8217;t put that in quotations. </p>
<p>&#8211;I don&#8217;t write the headlines, but I do know that our editor (who does write the headlines) was not intending to suggest that only Huckabee visits Newport Beach for fund-raisers &#8212; that would be kind of ridiculous, I agree. He meant it was an &#8220;ATM&#8221; for all candidates; it&#8217;s a joke he&#8217;s made in other headlines as well. </p>
<p>&#8211;I don&#8217;t think that &#8220;criticism&#8221; necessarily denotes vitriolic denunciations. I would say your post above is critical of what I wrote in the Pilot, though hardly a verbal bomb. </p>
<p>Criticize:<br />
 2  : to find fault with : point out the faults of  </p>
<p>Thanks for the nod, however. Nice meeting you at the event. </p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisCaesar</title>
		<link>http://blogforbooks.com/archives/2008/02/01/oc-fundraiser-for-huckabee-a-huge-success/comment-page-1/#comment-23655</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisCaesar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogforbooks.com/archives/2008/02/01/oc-fundraiser-for-huckabee-a-huge-success/#comment-23655</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Stacy,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Glad you liked the article. Just to respond to some of your points:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;--According to my notes, you said &quot;if there was one thing I could change about this campaign, it would be that [the country music].&quot; I agree it was jocularly said, but the point seemed to be earnestly made. It&#039;s true you didn&#039;t, verbatim, refer to them as &quot;themes&quot;, though I didn&#039;t put that in quotations. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;--I don&#039;t write the headlines, but I do know that our editor (who does write the headlines) was not intending to suggest that only Huckabee visits Newport Beach for fund-raisers -- that would be kind of ridiculous, I agree. He meant it was an &quot;ATM&quot; for all candidates; it&#039;s a joke he&#039;s made in other headlines as well. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;--I don&#039;t think that &quot;criticism&quot; necessarily denotes vitriolic denunciations. I would say your post above is critical of what I did, but it&#039;s certainly not a verbal bomb. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2  : to find fault with : point out the faults of  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the nod.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Chris&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stacy,</p>
<p>Glad you liked the article. Just to respond to some of your points:</p>
<p>&#8211;According to my notes, you said &#8220;if there was one thing I could change about this campaign, it would be that [the country music].&#8221; I agree it was jocularly said, but the point seemed to be earnestly made. It&#8217;s true you didn&#8217;t, verbatim, refer to them as &#8220;themes&#8221;, though I didn&#8217;t put that in quotations. </p>
<p>&#8211;I don&#8217;t write the headlines, but I do know that our editor (who does write the headlines) was not intending to suggest that only Huckabee visits Newport Beach for fund-raisers &#8212; that would be kind of ridiculous, I agree. He meant it was an &#8220;ATM&#8221; for all candidates; it&#8217;s a joke he&#8217;s made in other headlines as well. </p>
<p>&#8211;I don&#8217;t think that &#8220;criticism&#8221; necessarily denotes vitriolic denunciations. I would say your post above is critical of what I did, but it&#8217;s certainly not a verbal bomb. </p>
<p>2  : to find fault with : point out the faults of  </p>
<p>Thanks for the nod.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
