Pedophilia Promoted on Delta Airlines Flight">Pedophilia Promoted on Delta Airlines Flight
The following was written by Ray Comfort and is published in its entirety at WorldView Weekend.
Good News for Pedophiles — Ray Comfort
Thanks to Delta airlines, you can now sit back and enjoy pedophilia while you fly in comfort across America. While there are certain passengers who may appreciate it, I don’t think I am alone in my convictions when it comes to the sexual exploitation of our children. I don’t like it.
…
Recently Kirk Cameron, I, and my son-in-law Emeal Zwayne, were flying from Atlanta to Los Angeles. Halfway into the flight, Kirk suddenly looked up and said, What’s going on!� We looked up at the more than twenty screens to see what looked like a nine-year-old child sexually gyrating and stripping in front of an adult audience. As we watched in horror, a few of the adults in her audience stood to their feet and began to clap to the music, obviously encouraging her to strip further, which she gladly did.
The airline kindly warned that the movie contained adult situations, strong language and violence, and reviews said that it was hilariously funny. No doubt the film’s makers had a reason for their juvenile stripping scene, but what we were looking at wasn’t a normal adult situation, nor was it funny. This was the promotion of pedophilia in the public arena.








My husband and I recently returned from a trip where we flew on United Airlines. We saw the same movie, “Little Miss. Sunshine”. Though there were some objectionable scenes and story lines in the movie, the suicidal homosexual, and how they dealt with grandpa’s death, the little girl’s ’strip’ scene didn’t offend me. Why? She wasn’t naked and it was not sexy or provacative. Let me just state that, yes, I am against child pornography. I felt, though, that the strip scene depicted more than a little girl taking off a layer of clothes (only to reveal ANOTHER layer of clothes, again she was not naked).
The first underlying message was what happens when parents aren’t involved in their children’s lives. They left her talent routine up to grandpa who obviously had some issues regarding women and their sexuality. I’d like to know how the little girl was able to train for the beauty pageant at home and keep her parents compeletely in the dark about what she was going to perform?
And, like it or not, her family was trying to support her without making her feel ‘bad’ or ‘dirty’ for what she was doing.
I also felt she was the most innocent of all the little girls there at the beauty pageant and that the other little girls who were overly made up to look like grown women were more sexual and exhibited child pornographic tendancies more than the little girl in the ’strip’ scene.
I think it’s more exploitative to dress up a prepubescent girl to look like a grown woman and parade her around in a skimpy bathing suit thrusting out her hip when she turns that it is for a little girl who doesn’t comprehend what she’s doing to do a mock strip tease.
In fact, I see what she did as a parody of child beauty pageants. I hope it shines a light on them and perhaps laws will be passed to set some age limits on these pageants.
Child beauty pageants are more exploitative and destructive to children than that strip scene will ever be because more people will be upset about the strip scene due to the stigma stripping has (and rightly so) in our society than do these beauty pageants.
I think to be upset about the strip scene is a knee jerk reaction. Where’s the indignation over the rest of the beauty pageant scenes?